In social justice conversations and communications, how can we use language that is simultaneously 1) disruptive and 2) constructive that also 3) meets the litmus test of no conflicting or competing implicit assumptions? Should social justice language strive toward meeting these three criteria in order to be effective?

See my handout from a recent presentation for some more thoughts on this topic.

(c) The Fruition Coalition 2001-2018. All Rights Reserved.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This
%d bloggers like this: